Do
religious/political
conservatives really believe
God gives them permission to
pretend this world is far
simpler than it is?
Take
the abortion issue, which,
thanks to budget wrangles over
Planned Parenthood, is back.
Let’s for one moment follow
The Donald’s lead, set aside
a
woman’s right to privacy (the
central legal issue), and
boldly go into the rightness
or wrongness of abortion,
itself.
Is
abortion always morally wrong?
Got
me. The older I get, the more
such black-and-white morality
seems to be mostly about my
own comfort; about the world
as I’d like it to be; a
world that comes with
instructions. Not the world I
actually live in which is
choc-a-block full of pain,
suffering, sleaze, greed,
fear-mongering and unwanted
children.
I
saw my first addicted babies
years ago while helping a TV
station with the Children’s
Miracle Network Telethon. They
sent me to the New Born
Intensive Care Unit at the
University of Virginia
Hospital, where, swathed from
bosom to toe in sequins, I
made my pitch for funding
beside a row of addicted
babies, all tiny as
partridges, all shaking, all
feathered with the needles
necessary to pump them full of
whatever was keeping them
alive. They’d been birthed
by addicts incapable of
raising them; women who’d
been unable to stop using
drugs long enough to give
their babies a fighting chance
at a decent life should
someone else be found who was
willing to raise them.
Now
this is certainly a sorry way
to give life to a child, but
my disapproval of their
mothers’ choices didn’t
make those addicted babies any
less real. And I’m sure
there would have many other
such babies in the NICU had
they not been aborted.
Pro-life
advocates (among them those
conservative politicians who
would de-fund Planned
Parenthood) like to keep
morality simple. They maintain
that abortion is always wrong,
because, they claim, God says
we shall not kill people
(except criminals and
enemies). But shouldn’t
anyone claiming such a
clear-cut mandate from
God—in this case everyone
who holds that abortion is
always wrong because God says
it is and that’s the end of
it— be required to face that
issue at play in the real
world? Shouldn’t
right-to-lifers have the moral
right to talk in terms of
“God saying” and “God
wanting” and “God
thinking” about unwanted
babies only after they,
themselves, have stood beside
one that’s been born
addicted or brain-damaged in
some new born intensive care
unit and realistically
considered that particular
baby’s future? Of course, a
black-and-white, conservative
religious approach to morality
is more comfortable than a
NICU approach, but surely our
own comfort doesn’t mean we
can claim moral righteousness
at a safe remove from reality.
Perhaps
while they’re out
acquainting themselves with
this human tragedy,
Virginia’s conservative
Christian politicians might
also visit the children of the
state’s under-funded foster
care programs. There are some
1300 children waiting for
adoption in the state –
children whom Virginia’s
Board of Social Services has
just decided may not be
jointly adopted by a loving
gay couple.
This
decision was made after
dueling legal opinions on the
legality of allowing gay
couples to adopt had been
issued by former Attorney
General Bill Mims and current
AG Ken Cucinnelli. But to my
mind Virginia Governor Bob
McDonnell voiced the true
reason for alarm at legalizing
gay couple adoption when he
said, “Many
of our adoption agencies are
faith-based groups that ought
to be able to establish what
their own policies are.”
Does
Virginia’s governor believe
religious beliefs trump the
exigent needs of children? And
that somehow preventing the
adoption of children by gay
couples is keeping the faith?
Which
leads me back to my original
question: Is abortion always
wrong?
Before
you answer yes, go to a NICU
and spend some time with an
abandoned, addicted baby. Are
you willing to take that baby
home? And if you’re not,
then who are you to say that
God, humanity’s engine of
love and compassion, demands
that all babies have to be
born?